Pluralistic: Tiktokification shall set us free (17 Apr 2026)

Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

View Original ↗
AI 導讀 industry market 重要性 4/5

Mark Zuckerberg 正用 AI 與演算法取代你社群動態裡的朋友,卻意外打破了綁架使用者的最後護城河。

  • 真實朋友互動無法帶來極致的廣告曝光,成為社群平台尋求利潤極大化的絆腳石。
  • Tiktok 模式促使平台用高度可互換的 AI slop 與短影音取代具備不可替代性的真實社交。
  • 平台消滅人類內容的唯我論幻想,反而消除了轉換成本,加速使用者逃離的步伐。

Mark Zuckerberg 正在摧毀 Facebook 最具價值的資產:你的朋友。社群平台高層發現真實社交無法搾取最多的廣告曝光,正聯手將平台 Tiktok 化(Tiktokification),甚至試圖用 AI 創作者取代人類。這場消滅真實連結的極端實驗,意外成為使用者逃離平台的最佳契機。

Facebook 營收極大化的 1 個阻礙:朋友太無聊

當初吸引你註冊 FacebookInstagram 的關鍵,在於與現實世界中的朋友保持聯繫。但對 Mark Zuckerberg 而言,你的朋友卻成了增加營收的絆腳石。根據定義,你和朋友擁有高度重疊的背景與價值觀,你們通常消費相似的媒體、閱讀同一種類型的新聞。這意味著朋友很難在平凡的一天裡,突然拋出極具顛覆性的觀點來引發長達數小時的激烈爭論。每次你和朋友和平地結束社交互動並登出平台,Zuckerberg 就會損失一筆潛在的廣告費。如果你的朋友圈中真有那種無時無刻引發無休止爭吵的人,你們大概早就斷絕往來了。真實世界的友誼建立在互相扶持之上,而不是為了給社群平台帶來「最大化參與度」。

Tiktok 崛起的 1 項演算法革命與加熱工具

Facebook 早期能經歷火箭般的爆發成長,正是因為讓人們與關心的人建立連結,但這條路線很快觸及了利潤極大化的天花板。Zuckerberg 隨後嘗試不顧使用者同意,強行將陌生人的爭議性內容塞進動態消息,試圖用怒火激發大腦的邊緣系統。然而,這種充滿網路酸民的環境很快就讓人感到精疲力盡,多數人根本不想每天被毫無關聯的陌生人折磨。Tiktok 找到了破解之道,他們用金錢報酬將吸引注意力的繁重工作,外包給全球無數渴望成名的表演者。Tiktok 的策略極度成功,甚至越過機器學習的正常預測,直接使用內部的加熱工具(heating tool)竄改演算法,讓特定創作者誤以為自己在這個平台上特別受歡迎。這項創新引發了科技巨頭的強烈嫉妒,促使 InstagramTwitter 大舉轉向。這些平台大幅減少朋友貼文的曝光,改為強推竭力尋求認同的短影音,實現讓別人去說服使用者留在平台上的終極目標。

引入 AI creators 實現 1 種唯我論的終極幻想

人類創作者比起你的朋友確實更能帶來參與度,但他們也更具自我意識且不甘於被平台任意擺布。許多創作者產出的內容品質極高,他們清楚經營頻道的目的是改善自身生活,而非單純替平台股東打工。當內容創作者意識到自身價值時,會毫不猶豫地在 YouTubeTiktok 等多個平台之間游走發布內容。這些創作者會抱怨政策改變、要求演算法透明度,甚至認為自己有權參與平台的營運方向。面對這些不受控的流量資產,科技巨頭找到了完美的替代方案:AI creators(人工智慧創作者)。這類虛擬網紅同樣能將使用者的觀看時間推向極限,讓系統塞入更多廣告,但他們永遠不會對高層提出抗議。這完美契合了億萬富翁的唯我論幻想(solipsist fantasy),打造出一個只有無盡利潤、卻沒有任何人類抗爭的封閉機器。

挾持朋友作為人質與 100% 互換的 AI slop

平台高層在推行這項無人化計畫時,忽略了一個致命缺陷:朋友並非平台的負債,而是他們用來挾持你的唯一籌碼。你之所以忍受各種糟糕的使用者體驗,是因為要在週末與朋友協調跳槽到哪一個新平台實在太過麻煩。平台精心計算著施加在使用者身上的痛苦劑量,精準控制在剛剛好低於你對平台的恨意,同時高於你對朋友的愛的臨界點。然而,真實朋友的動態具備不可替代性(non-fungible),而演算法推送的 AI slop(AI 產生的垃圾內容)卻是現代科技所能製造出最具可替代性的數位工業產物。當 Instagram 的動態被跟 YouTube 毫無二致的虛擬網紅填滿時,平台正在親手摧毀那道防止使用者流失的最後護城河。隨著真實社交被徹底剝離,離開這些平台的摩擦力正以肉眼可見的速度消失。

過去 10 年基礎設施崩壞與權力集中的印證

這場社群媒體的質變並非孤立事件,而是科技巨頭掌控數位基礎設施後必然走向的終局。回顧過去十年的產業紀錄,企業一旦利用技術壁壘鞏固地位,便會毫不猶豫地轉移成本並剝削使用者。例如十年前 Uber 被揭露其商業模式高度依賴絕望的勞動力,而 Tesla 甚至曾在 2025 年被指控透過駭入車輛里程表來逃避保固責任。當社群平台為了追求沒有人類存在的虛幻夢想,無情地將最重要的社交資產送進碎紙機時,歷史的教訓已然浮現。這種將人類連結徹底邊緣化的商業決策,反而在無意間解除了對使用者的社交綁架,為未來的去中心化網路與數位主權鋪平了道路。

科技巨頭為了極大化廣告收益而消滅真實社交,卻意外摧毀了綑綁使用者的最後護城河。

Abstract

Today's links Tiktokification shall set us free: Zuck keeps accidentally freeing his hostages. Hey look at this: Delights to delectate. Object permanence: B2B Trotsky; Public service games; NZ 3 strikes rule; Snowden, vocalist; Obama says money compromised him; Bullshit treescrapers; Tesla's odometer heist. Upcoming appearances: Los Angeles, San Francisco, London, Berlin, Barcelona, NYC, Hay-on-Wye, London, NYC. Recent appearances: Where I've been. Latest books: You keep readin' em, I'll keep writin' 'em. Upcoming books: Like I said, I'll keep writin' 'em. Colophon: All the rest. Tiktokification shall set us free (permalink) Mark Zuckerberg has a problem with your friends: they're the reason you signed up to use his platform, but they stubbornly refuse to organize your socialization to "maximize engagement." Every time you and your friends wrap up a social interaction and log off, Zuckerberg loses revenue. After all, by definition, you and your friends have a lot of shared context. You probably feel mostly the same way about most things. You probably mostly consume the same kind of media. You probably mostly consume the same kinds of news. You and your friends make each other's lives better in lots of ways, but typically not by surprising one another. On a typical day, no friend of yours is going to absolutely floor you with a novel thought or finding that sparks hours of furious conversation and argumentation. And speaking of argumentation: you and your friends probably don't argue that much – I mean, sure, you'll have "friendly disagreements" (again, by definition), but if there's a friend who sparks furious, frustrating, irresistible feuds that drag on and on, chances are that person won't be your friend anymore. Facebook experienced sustained, meteoric growth by letting people connect with their friends, but Zuckerberg quickly came to understand that his path to revenue maximization ran through nonconsensually cramming strangers' posts into your eyeballs, in the hopes that you would lose yourself in long, pointless arguments. But that, too, hit a limit. Most of us don't like having our limbic systems tormented by strangers. As anyone who is sick to the back teeth of just hearing the word "Trump" can attest, living in a trollocracy is exhausting. Enter Tiktok. Tiktok found a way to connect you to strangers who don't make you angry. By offering performers money if they produced media that you "engaged" with, Tiktok offloaded the work of convincing you to conduct your online activities in a way that maximized opportunities to show you an ad onto an army of global theater kids who would spend every hour that god sent trying to figure out how to keep you looking at Tiktok. This was hugely successful – so successful, in fact, that Tiktok was able to cheat, overriding its own algorithmic guesses about which of its billion cable-access television channels you'd stare at the longest with a "heating tool" that lets the company trick some of those theater kids into thinking that Tiktok was actually more suited to them than other platforms: https://pluralistic.net/2023/01/21/potemkin-ai/#hey-guys For zuckermuskian social media bosses, Tiktok became an object of fierce envy. Here was the ultimate Tom Sawyer robo-fence-painter, a self-licking ice-cream cone that motivated people to convince each other to make money for you. Facebook, Instagram and Twitter took a hard pivot away from showing you the things that the people you loved had to say, in favor of showing you short videos of people whose parents didn't give them enough affection in their childhood, desperately shoving lemons up their noses in a bid to win your approval (and a revshare split with the platforms). It worked. Sorta. Thing is, some of those "content creators" are actually very good, and none of them appreciate being jerked around. They quite rightly see their reason for being on the platforms as improving their own lives, not the bottom line of the platforms' owners and executives. They may be more "engaging" than your friends, but they're also a lot mouthier and feel entitled to a say in how the platform operates. What's a billionaire solipsist to do? Obviously, the answer is "AI creators." An "AI creator" is like a "creator" in that it works to maximize your engagement with the platform – and thus the number of ads that can be crammed into your face-holes – but, unlike a "creator," it makes no demands upon the platform and exists solely to serve the platform's shareholders and executives. It's the perfect realization of the solipsist fantasy of a world without people: https://pluralistic.net/2026/01/05/fisher-price-steering-wheel/#billionaire-solipsism But there's a problem with this plan: your friends are not a liability for a platform. Your friends are the platforms' single most important asset. Your friends are why the platforms are so "sticky." The platforms don't "hack your dopamine loops" – they just take your friends hostage, and even though you love your friends, they are a monumental pain in the ass, and if you can't even agree on what board-game you're going to play this weekend, how are you going to agree when it's time to leave Facebook, and where to go next? https://pluralistic.net/2023/01/08/watch-the-surpluses/#exogenous-shocks So long as you love your friends more than you hate Zuckerberg or Musk, you will remain stuck to their platforms. The platform bosses know this, and they inflict pain on you that is titrated to be just below the threshold where you hate the platforms more than you love your friends. But as much as the platform bosses rely on your love of your friends, they still view your friends as liabilities, thanks to those friends' unreasonable insistence on structuring their relationship with you to maximize their own satisfaction, rather than how much time you spend looking at ads. So the platforms are deliberately disconnecting you from your friends by minimizing the fraction of your feed that is given over to posts from people you follow, and replacing those friends with a succession of ever-more fungible posters: trolls, creators, and chatbots. The key word here is fungible. A feed composed of things posted by people you have a personal connection to is non-fungible: it cannot be swapped for a feed of things posted by strangers. Your friends fulfill a very specific purpose in your life that strangers – even extremely cool strangers – cannot match. On the other hand: one feed of algorithmically selected, entertaining amateur dramatics is broadly equivalent to any other feed of algorithmically selected amateur dramatics. That goes double for feeds whose performers are "multi-homing" on more than one platform – whether you see the extremely charming and interesting Vlog Brothers in a Youtube feed, a Tiktok feed or an Insta feed makes no difference (to you – but it matters a lot to the platform bosses). That goes quintuple for feeds composed of AI slop, which is literally the most interchangeable video that modern science is capable of producing. All of which is to say: the platforms are deliberately feeding their most important commercial assets into a shredder, in a fit of pique over your friends' unwillingness to act like chatbots. Every day and in every way, the platforms are making it easier to leave them for some rival's service, chasing the billionaire solipsist's dream of a world without people: https://pluralistic.net/2022/02/17/live-by-the-swordlive-by-the-sword/#unfriending-tom Hey look at this (permalink) Keep Android Open https://keepandroidopen.org/cta/ Here comes the sun: New bill would let New Yorkers hang solar panels from windows https://gothamist.com/news/here-comes-the-sun-new-bill-would-let-new-yorkers-hang-solar-panels-from-windows The OTW is Recruiting for Legal Committee Paralegals, Legal Committee Trademark Specialists, and Policy & Abuse Volunteers https://www.transformativeworks.org/the-otw-is-recruiting-for-legal-committee-paralegals-legal-committee-trademark-specialists-and-policy-abuse-volunteers/ Tech Giants and Giant Slayers: The case for Digital Sovereignty and the Digital Commons https://www.openrightsgroup.org/publications/tech-giants-and-giant-slayers-the-case-for-digital-sovereignty-and-the-digital-commons/ What We’re Reading https://link.newyorker.com/view/5be9ea0f3f92a404690229b0qwzpk.245v/8abef04b Object permanence (permalink) #25yrsago Leon Trotsky, B2B visionary https://web.archive.org/web/20020211212222/http://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/works/1935/1935-ame.htm #20yrsago What would a BBC “public service game” look like? https://web.archive.org/web/20060417123908/http://crystaltips.typepad.com/wonderland/2006/04/on_public_servi.html #15yrsago New Zealand’s 3-strikes rule can go into effect in September https://legislation.govt.nz/bill/government/2010/119/en/latest/#DLM3331800 #15yrsago Lawsuit: DRM spied on me, gathered my personal info, sent it to copyright enforcers who called me with $150,000 legal threat https://www.techdirt.com/2011/04/14/drm-accused-sending-personal-info-to-help-with-licensing-shakedown/ #10yrsago Edward Snowden provides vocals on a beautiful new Jean-Michel Jarre composition https://web.archive.org/web/20190415045927/https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/edward-snowdens-new-job-electronic-music-vocalist-184650/ #10yrsago Uber and Lyft don’t cover their cost of capital and rely on desperate workers https://www.ianwelsh.net/the-market-fairy-will-not-solve-the-problems-of-uber-and-lyft/? #10yrsago Treescrapers are bullshit https://99percentinvisible.org/article/renderings-vs-reality-rise-tree-covered-skyscrapers/ #10yrsago Before and After Mexico: a Bruce Sterling story about the eco-pocalypse https://bruces.medium.com/before-and-after-mexico-f3371c346c8a#.33e9poqnx #10yrsago Barack Obama: Taking money from 1 percenters compromised my politics https://web.archive.org/web/20160415201709/https://theintercept.com/2016/04/15/barack-obama-never-said-money-wasnt-corrupting-in-fact-he-said-the-opposite/ #1yrago Tesla accused of hacking odometers to weasel out of warranty repairs https://pluralistic.net/2025/04/15/musklemons/#more-like-edison-amirite Upcoming appearances (permalink) Los Angeles: LA Times Festival of Books, Apr 19 https://www.latimes.com/events/festival-of-books San Francisco: 2026 Berkeley Spring Forum on M&A and the Boardroom, Apr 23 https://www.theberkeleyforum.com/#agenda London: Resisting Big Tech Empires (LSBU), Apr 25 https://www.tickettailor.com/events/globaljusticenow/2042691 NYC: Enshittification at Commonweal Ventures, Apr 29 https://luma.com/ssgfvqz8 NYC: Techidemic with Sarah Jeong, Tochi Onyibuchi and Alia Dastagir (PEN World Voices), Apr 30 https://worldvoices.pen.org/event/techidemic/ Barcelona: Internet no tiene que ser un vertedero (Global Digital Rights Forum), May 13 https://encuentroderechosdigitales.com/en/ Berlin: Re:publica, May 18-20 https://re-publica.com/de/news/rp26-sprecher-cory-doctorow Berlin: Enshittification at Otherland Books, May 19 https://www.otherland-berlin.de/de/event-details/cory-doctorow.html Hay-on-Wye: HowTheLightGetsIn, May 22-25 https://howthelightgetsin.org/festivals/hay/big-ideas-2 SXSW London, Jun 2 https://www.sxswlondon.com/session/how-big-tech-broke-the-internet-b3c4a901 NYC: The Reverse Centaur's Guide to Life After AI (The Strand), Jun 24 https://www.strandbooks.com/cory-doctorow-the-reverse-centaur-s-guide-to-life-after-ai.html Recent appearances (permalink) Pete "Mayor" Buttigieg (No Gods No Mayors) https://www.patreon.com/posts/pete-mayor-with-155614612 The internet is getting worse (CBC The National) https://youtu.be/dCVUCdg3Uqc?si=FMcA0EI_Mi13Lw-P Do you feel screwed over by big tech? (Ontario Today) https://www.cbc.ca/listen/live-radio/1-45-ontario-today/clip/16203024-do-feel-screwed-big-tech Launch for Cindy's Cohn's "Privacy's Defender" (City Lights) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WuVCm2PUalU Chicken Mating Harnesses (This Week in Tech) https://twit.tv/shows/this-week-in-tech/episodes/1074 Latest books (permalink) "Canny Valley": A limited edition collection of the collages I create for Pluralistic, self-published, September 2025 https://pluralistic.net/2025/09/04/illustrious/#chairman-bruce "Enshittification: Why Everything Suddenly Got Worse and What to Do About It," Farrar, Straus, Giroux, October 7 2025 https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374619329/enshittification/ "Picks and Shovels": a sequel to "Red Team Blues," about the heroic era of the PC, Tor Books (US), Head of Zeus (UK), February 2025 (https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781250865908/picksandshovels). "The Bezzle": a sequel to "Red Team Blues," about prison-tech and other grifts, Tor Books (US), Head of Zeus (UK), February 2024 (thebezzle.org). "The Lost Cause:" a solarpunk novel of hope in the climate emergency, Tor Books (US), Head of Zeus (UK), November 2023 (http://lost-cause.org). "The Internet Con": A nonfiction book about interoperability and Big Tech (Verso) September 2023 (http://seizethemeansofcomputation.org). Signed copies at Book Soup (https://www.booksoup.com/book/9781804291245). "Red Team Blues": "A grabby, compulsive thriller that will leave you knowing more about how the world works than you did before." Tor Books http://redteamblues.com. "Chokepoint Capitalism: How to Beat Big Tech, Tame Big Content, and Get Artists Paid, with Rebecca Giblin", on how to unrig the markets for creative labor, Beacon Press/Scribe 2022 https://chokepointcapitalism.com Upcoming books (permalink) "The Reverse-Centaur's Guide to AI," a short book about being a better AI critic, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, June 2026 (https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374621568/thereversecentaursguidetolifeafterai/) "Enshittification, Why Everything Suddenly Got Worse and What to Do About It" (the graphic novel), Firstsecond, 2026 "The Post-American Internet," a geopolitical sequel of sorts to Enshittification, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2027 "Unauthorized Bread": a middle-grades graphic novel adapted from my novella about refugees, toasters and DRM, FirstSecond, 2027 "The Memex Method," Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 2027 Colophon (permalink) Today's top sources: Currently writing: "The Post-American Internet," a sequel to "Enshittification," about the better world the rest of us get to have now that Trump has torched America. Third draft completed. Submitted to editor. "The Reverse Centaur's Guide to AI," a short book for Farrar, Straus and Giroux about being an effective AI critic. LEGAL REVIEW AND COPYEDIT COMPLETE. "The Post-American Internet," a short book about internet policy in the age of Trumpism. PLANNING. A Little Brother short story about DIY insulin PLANNING This work – excluding any serialized fiction – is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. That means you can use it any way you like, including commercially, provided that you attribute it to me, Cory Doctorow, and include a link to pluralistic.net. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Quotations and images are not included in this license; they are included either under a limitation or exception to copyright, or on the basis of a separate license. Please exercise caution. How to get Pluralistic: Blog (no ads, tracking, or data-collection): Pluralistic.net Newsletter (no ads, tracking, or data-collection): https://pluralistic.net/plura-list Mastodon (no ads, tracking, or data-collection): https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic Bluesky (no ads, possible tracking and data-collection): https://bsky.app/profile/doctorow.pluralistic.net Medium (no ads, paywalled): https://doctorow.medium.com/ Tumblr (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising): https://mostlysignssomeportents.tumblr.com/tagged/pluralistic "When life gives you SARS, you make sarsaparilla" -Joey "Accordion Guy" DeVilla READ CAREFULLY: By reading this, you agree, on behalf of your employer, to release me from all obligations and waivers arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licenses, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap, browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and acceptable use policies ("BOGUS AGREEMENTS") that I have entered into with your employer, its partners, licensors, agents and assigns, in perpetuity, without prejudice to my ongoing rights and privileges. You further represent that you have the authority to release me from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of your employer. ISSN: 3066-764X